HEADLINES

USA: Think Trump Cannot Win Election – Think Again

By Felix Salmon, February 18, 2016. First appeared in Fusion.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a event at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, Thursday, Jan. 28, 2016. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik) Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at a event at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, Thursday, Jan. 28, 2016. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

Trump can win this thing. First the Republican nomination, and then the presidency. Here’s how it happens.

The nomination is actually the easy bit:

The prediction markets already have him at a 50% chance of winning the Republican nomination, far ahead of anybody else, and rising steadily.

He’s also the second most likely person to win the presidency outright.

Clinton is the favorite, at 50%; Trump is second, at 16%; Rubio is third, at 11%; and Sanders is fourth, at 9%. Ted Cruz… priced at only a 3% chance of becoming president.

All of this makes sense. Think about it this way:

Republican Candidates (left to right): Kasich, Bush, and Rubio,

Republican Candidates (left to right): Kasich, Bush, and Rubio,

The three establishment candidates—Bush, Kasich, and Rubio—have about 30% of the vote among them. That’s simply not enough to band together and win the nomination, even if Bush and Kasich both decide to drop out and support Rubio tomorrow, which they won’t.

Meanwhile, Trump is barnstorming all over the country, changing the rules of politics as he goes. Presidential politics is always about personalities more than it is about policies, and Trump is a walking avatar of the America that the white working class has lost.

He’s big, he’s brash, he’s bold, he’s shameless and profane and unapologetic. And that has undeniable appeal.

Trump’s no out-of-touch, famous-for-D.C. type;

Donald Trump has hired serious strategists as he gets going on his presidential bid.

Donald Trump has hired serious strategists as he gets going on his presidential bid.

instead, he has masterfully positioned himself as the obvious choice for all angry protest voters.

For millions of Americans, the George W. Bush administration was a disaster, and little has improved under Barack Obama.

A vote for Trump is a vote against all of the politicians, from both parties, who have brought us to our present situation.

If Obama handily won among “it’s time for a change” voters in 2008, then it’s Trump who’s winning that crucial constituency in 2016. Except that this year, the Change caucus is much bigger, and much angrier, than it was in 2008.

Trump also has bipartisan support.

Hillary Clinton is very much on track to have the Democratic nomination sewn up sooner or later, and once she does, it’s an open question whom the Sanders supporters will end up voting for. Most of them, most likely, will throw their support behind Clinton.

But a lot of them will go to Trump. After all, insofar as Sanders covets Trump’s supporters, then turnabout is fair play.

Consider:

Trump has done a better job of attacking the Republican candidates than either of the Democrats have.

And on top bashing the Bush family repeatedly, he’s happy to praise the overwhelming majority of Planned Parenthood’s activities, supports a ban on assault weapons, wants to raise taxes on hedge-fund billionaires, and has a host of other liberal positions.

You don’t register as a Republican because you’re angry and disillusioned:

For millions of Americans, the George W. Bush administration was a disaster, and little has improved under Barack Obama. A vote for Trump is a vote against all of the politicians, from both parties, who have brought us to our present situation. If Obama handily won among “it’s time for a change” voters in 2008, then it’s Trump who’s winning that crucial constituency in 2016. Except that this year, the Change caucus is much bigger, and much angrier, than it was in 2008.There are angry and disillusioned Americans in both parties, and among the Democrats, while their head might be telling them to vote for Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump is making a strong play for their heart.

Nothing’s really going to change under President Clinton, after all. President Trump would at least start breaking things.

Going into a general election against Clinton, then, Trump is going to have all of his Republican supporters, plus a large chunk of Sanders supporters, plus an even larger chunk of otherwise apolitical Americans who have finally found a politician they can admire: the guy who fired people on TV.

The turnout in 2016 will be a record high, and a lot of the new voters won’t be young:

They will be people who just didn’t care about politics at all before Trump came along.

Trump is in many ways the American Silvio Berlusconi:

bombastic, larger than life, magnetic despite being entirely unsympathetic. He’s the focal point of attention in any room he walks into, and if the strength he projects is the strength of a bully, then, well, that’s better than not projecting any strength at all.

Obama’s policy successes have often been invisible to the general public:

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.In domestic policy the payroll-tax holiday was a fantastic stimulus, for instance, in large part because no one really knew it was happening. And diplomatic successes in foreign policy, such as the deal with Iran, are always going to be a hard sell.

In Trump’s world, by contrast, you can always tell when he’s won because someone else has lost.

It’s a much easier message to understand, and it resonates beyond the normal group of Americans who vote in elections.

Which means that if Trump’s going to lose the general election, he’s going to lose because a majority of normal, sane people just can’t bring themselves to vote for him, and will vote for Clinton to keep him out of the Oval Office.

Except there’s a real chance that the normal-and-sane vote is going to end up being split by Mike Bloomberg.

And then there’s an even bigger problem with the theory that normal and sane people will stop Trump from being elected: 
Republicans.
Certainly most Democrats will vote for Clinton. But to stop an insurgent Trump, she’s going to want Republicans, too.And the fact is that Republicans are much more likely to hold their nose and vote for Trump than they are to vote for Clinton.

The reason is simple:

Republicans control both houses of Congress already, and there’s a good chance that they’ll continue to do so for some if not all of the next four years. When that happens, Congress can pass bold conservative legislation; all it needs to become law is a presidential signature.

And while Clinton will certainly veto all such legislation that comes to her desk, Trump will be much more likely to sign it.

This is an argument no one has any interest in making until after Trump becomes the nominee. But once that happens,

the Republican Party will swing into action:

Its agenda is much better served by having Trump in the White House than by having Clinton or even Bloomberg.

Once pretty much every Republican in Congress starts supporting Trump over his opponent, it becomes much harder for individual Republicans to vote any other way—no matter how disgusted they are by his statements about women, or how worried they are that the orange man might have his finger on the nuclear trigger.

Republicans will vote for Trump, in other words, not because he will be an effective leader of the Republican Party:

GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump Campaigns In South Carolina Ahead Of State's PrimaryHe wouldn’t be.

But rather because he would be an effective follower of the Republican Party. He will sign where the party tells him to sign, since there’s no reason for him not to.

If Trump gets the Republicans, and also a significant chunk of the Democrats, and a lot of Americans who normally never vote at all, then that’s the election right there.

It’s not necessarily the most likely outcome—yet. But it can happen.

And here’s the scariest thing: while any number of unforeseeable events, from natural disasters to terrorist attacks, could change the dynamics of the race, none of those are under the control of any rival political campaign.

He’s the most bulletproof politician America has seen in a very long time. No one, right now, has a clue how to stop him. We have nine months to work it out.

🔝

Fusion: President Donald Trump: here’s how he could win the election.

Click Picture for a Popular Article

  • The remnants of a US drone strike on August 29, 2012 in Khashamir, Yemen. The strike killed three alleged members of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, a policeman, and a cleric who preached against the armed group.
  • The month is also a time of community; it is the custom for Muslims to invite their neighbours and friends to share their evening meal – iftar – and recite special Tarawih prayers in congregation. It is also a time when Muslims try to reconnect with the Qur’an, which they believe is the word of God. However, Children, people who are sick or who have mental illness, elderly people for example do not have to fast.
  • Faces of the women who had their lives cut short by Pickton.
  • People searched for survivors in the rubble of houses destroyed by an airstrike in Sana, Yemen, on June 12. (Photo: Mohamed Al-Sayaghi/Reuters) alistairreignblog.com
  • Codepink protesters outside the NRA headquarters, Fairfax, Virginia June 19, 2016. (Photo: CODEPINK).
  • Refugee-girl-cries-as-her-Central-American-shanty-town-is-destroyed-0714-by-Spencer-Platt
  • ery same government who deliberately allowed this occupation to take place last fall. Regardless of what is happening with a possible injunction application, I urge every person to call the Premier’s office in the morning, telling her she has to get her administration working overtime to get rid of tent city and under no circumstances to move this horror story a block away into Mt. Edwards where we’ll then have a PERMANENT tent city indoors, with all the same shit going on every day and night!
  • A question I have been asked many times since I began covering the humanitarian crisis in Yemen; who is taking care of the war orphans in Yemen? It appears the world has forgotten them, perhaps because they are not considered refugee orphans, nobody is paying attention to the gross crimes against these little ones - committed at the hands of an invading regime - Saudi Arabia.. children isleep nside a pitt in the ground, it is now normal for adults to put children to sleep in a large hole to ptotect child from snipers andcluster bombs that spray shrapnel Yemen.
  • Journalist Deniz Yücel, along with four others, have been jailed pending trial on charges of propaganda in support of a terrorist organisation and inciting the public to violence.

Click Picture for a Popular Cartoon

  • Donald Trump will save the day
  • Donald Trump for President
  • Caption this winner sept 1
  • I hate Monday
  • Way-back Machine: Who Vogue'd It Best? Take our poll at Alistair Reign News Blog: AlistairReignBlog.com
  • GOP Caption winner first place on AlistairReignBlog.com
  • Putin Pumpkin Head
  • When cartoons turn into people
  • Who is PM Stephen Harper
  • Where's Steve - Satire Cartoon
  • Take Our Poll: Come on in and decide for yourself! Who worked the puffy white shirt best?
  • Nicki 'Minnie' Minaj
  • The moment Bruce Jenner realized he was a woman

Start a Conversation or Write a Caption This joke.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s